Wednesday, July 14, 2010
Driving While Intoxicated
1:35 pm edt
By Gerald J. Monahan, Esq.
New Jersey's drunk driving law has just gotten tougher. An Appeals Court has ruled in the case of State vs. Federico that DWI
defendant's involuntarily inhalation of a chemical while at work is not defense to a DWI charge at the time of his DWI arrest.
The defendant worked as an engineer for a Clifton company. Defendant's work exposed him to a chemical compound called limonene
which is common enough to be found in Pledge furniture polish. At trial defendant argued that even though his driving was
impaired, the impairment was involuntarily caused by the limonene inhaled at work and for this reason, should be found not
guilty of DWI.
The Court flatly rejected defendant's argument and found him guilty of DWI thereby significantly
broadening the ways in which a driver can be considered impaired.
Here is the take away: Exposure to chemicals, even if involuntary, that impair one's driving ability,
subject the impaired operator of a motor vehicle to the same penalties as a driver impaired by alcohol. A word to the wise:
"Do not inhale and drive."
Monday, January 14, 2008
Know Your Rights: DWI
1:44 pm est
KNOW YOUR RIGHTS
By Gerald J. Monahan, Esq.
It’s 11:30 P. M.
and soon you will be home for a good night’s sleep that will come easy. Not only has your work day been particularly
draining, you decided to cap it off with a few stiff ones at your favorite bar.
up ahead you see flashing red lights and hope that the accident is not serious. As you get closer, however, your body stiffens
when you realize it is not an accident, but a DWI road check. A police officer approaches your driver’s side and
politely orders you to produce your license etc. As he leans in close to you, the officer notices a “strong odor of alcohol” on your breath. He orders you out of your car and
directs that you perform field sobriety tests such as finger to nose, walking a straight line, counting backwards, etc. You
do pretty well. You do not stagger, slur or fumble. You are polite and responsive. In short you are probably not drunk but..........you
can’t be sure. Nevertheless, the police officer thinks you are drunk, places you under arrest for DWI. The next stop
is the police station where you find yourself face to face with something called a breathalyzer. This is a sophisticated machine
that accurately measures the amount of alcohol in your blood. Do you take this test or not? What happens if you do; what happens
if you don’t? As these questions scream in your tired brain you wish for the first time in your life that a lawyer was
sitting beside you. Let’s say your wish were granted. This is what the lawyer tells you: If you refuse
to blow into the machine, (and you have never been convicted of DWI), you automatically lose your license for six
months------- even if you are not legally intoxicated. If, however, you take the test and flunk it (ie. score
10 or better) you will be convicted of DWI and lose your license for six months [unless the machine is defective
or has not been properly tested]. It gets worse. If you refuse the test, you lose your license for six months and
can still be convicted of DWI based upon your behavior at the scene. If so, your license will be suspended for six
more additional months plus fines, penalties and surcharges.
What to do? Here is my answer: If your body tells you that you are not drunk, take the
test. If you score below .10 and you have passed the field sobriety tests, you either will not be charged with DWI or will
have an excellent chance of being not found guilty in municipal court. On the other hand, if you suspect you are drunk and
have done poorly in the field sobriety tests, take the test, flunk it and leave court with only a six months license
revocation. There is a third possibility. You can refuse the test and then be found not guilty of DWI in court. Although you
will lose your license for six months for failure to take the test, you will not have a conviction for DWI. If you
have to lose your license for six months it is better if it is for failure to take the test rather than for DWI.
You should choose this option if and only if you suspect you are drunk but nevertheless have managed to do well in the field
sobriety tests. In this case your lawyer can plausibly argue that your performance shows you are not legally intoxicated.
As you can see, none of your options are great. It is the law’s way of telling us not to drink when we drive.